Archive for the 'Seattle Real Estate Appraisal Information' Category

Motivations of Young Professionals

Patrick M. Lamb March 16th, 2011

What drives the recruitment and retention of talented young people to a professional association? Finding the answer has been a challenging and crucial task for the networking and social groups I belong to today. Having a better understanding of what motivates young professionals will help us attract and connect to the people we want to recruit.

A young professional is not exactly what you think- at least not in the way we interpret things in our YP group through the RMA. In our eyes, a young professional is more synonymous with being green, or novice at your trade. We do not operate under the assumption that you must be of a certain age to be young in your profession. However, in many cases, the members of our YP group tend to be young in age, as well. On the surface, this has created a bit of a misconception about our target market. The word ‘new’ could be substituted for ‘young’.

A young professional’s motivation to participate in a networking group might include the following:

-Recognition
-Generate leads (building business)
-Foster client relationships
-Size up competition
-Support system
-Sharing resources
-Opportunities for leadership roles
-Demonstrate skills
-Public Speaking opportunities
-Board and committee experience
-Satisfy work requirement
-Job search possibilities
-Troubleshooting ideas and issues
-Advice seeking
-Socializing
-Personal contact with clients
-Relating to like-kind peers with similar drive and aspirations

There is no doubt that the retention of talent is important for every organization’s long term planning strategy, strength, and overall stability. Moreover, the evolution and transition of leadership is the greatest reason why we need to engage talented young professionals today. I know first hand many organizations see this need, and actively pursue this mission. As promoters of these organizations, let’s recognize young professional motivations and create a platform for their success.

Here are a few associations and clubs that support YP groups: RMA (Risk Management Association), AI (Appraisal Institute), WSCPA (WA Certified Public Accountants), WSBA (WA Bar Association), Tower 39 Club (Social Club), CRPC (Certified Financial Planners), Rotary and Kiwanis (Philanthropy).

How’s My Tax Assessed Value High in THIS Market?

Edward A. Williamson January 15th, 2009

By Edward A. Williamson

How can my property tax assessment be so high in this market?

It’s no secret that the housing sales market in the region is getting tighter. The Northwest Multiple Listing Service (NWMLS) statistics report for July ’08 shows the YTD average sales price has fallen over $20,000 below the previous year’s average price, with this YTD number of units sold accounting for only 65% of 2007′s YTD totals. It seems that everyday there is a new TV news feature or newspaper article bemoaning the stagnant market.

And yet, when homeowners get their tax bills, their assessed value may have gone up by double digits! What the heck?

Commercial property in King County has been hit even harder. My work partner, Ed Boyle, and I are currently working on an appraisal of current market value for a tax appeal of a long-time local business whose assessed value went up 100%!

Do you think your property value is over-assessed? Don’t know how to appeal your assessment? Fortunately, the problem and a possible solution are linked together. The Assessor’s Office is forbidden by state law to take 2008 market sales into account for this apportionment. But you aren’t!

There are three approaches to successfully appealing your tax assessment:

  1. Can you show that the assessor’s office made a material mistake? If your assessed lot size or evaluation of structural details is significantly different than the actual surveyed size, this would suggest a manifest error. Check your assessment for material accuracy or math mistakes.
  2. Are you being assessed at a different rate than neighboring properties? It is the responsibility of the Board of Equalization to assure that comparable properties are assessed on an equal basis.
  3. Is your home’s assessed value roughly the same as the property’s current market value? As was mentioned earlier, the assessment may very well not reflect today’s fair market value.

You see, this year’s apportionment is based on a three year average value of nearby properties, with values calculated as of January 1, 2008. This three year averaging is intended to mitigate the market flux and capture present fair market value but when the brakes went on, the double-digit appreciation most of the region’s real estate had enjoyed, the market jolted to an abrupt stop, then dropped. And we’ve been sensing market downturn on the commercial side since about July of 2007.

So, how do you appeal? You must file two copies of the appeal petition with the Board of Equalization/Appeals, which must be received by the board on or before July 1st of the assessment year, or within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of the value change notice (or other notice of determination) - whichever is later. The information that the board requires is laid out in the Board of Equalization FAQ page; this site has a good deal of information and is a great place to start. You can begin to compile evidence by contacting the Property Tax Advisor in the assessor’s office for information on how your property was valued. You may need to get information on recent sales at that time, but I would strongly recommend performing your own research. Public records in our area are reasonably easy to come by. One key aspect is to locate comparable properties in your neighborhood that match your property as closely as possible. An identical match is not required, but the fewer the differences, the stronger your argument.

The King County Board of Equalization is made up of seven appointed citizen members. Their decisions are based on the legally-required exercise of “equalizing” the assessed value with the market value standard. That’s today’s market value standard, not the roller coaster of three years past.

And there’s your edge - the comparables you submit in evidence can come from this year’s market and, with good supporting data, you should make your case. Published reports put appeals received from the King County Board of Equalization this year at 1,800 as opposed to 750 by this time last year, with the outcome: Over half the appeals resulted in lowered taxes.

Of course, if your property is complex or commercial, it would pay to get a certified, professional appraiser involved. At Lamb Hanson Lamb Appraisal Associates, we often work on ad valorem appeals for both residential and commercial property assessments. So check out the County Assessor’s resources and start investigating. And don’t forget - the clock is ticking!

More Information: (for local counties)

Assessor’s Office

Board of Equalization/Appeals

  • King County
  • Pierce County
  • Kitsap County
  • Snohomish County
  • Thurston County
  • Skagit County

Taxpayer Appeal Petitions

Washington State Board of Appeals

Lawsuits and Privacy

Barry C. Wilson August 19th, 2008

When banks foreclose on real estate, they look for someone to cover their losses. In some recent lawsuits against appraisers in other areas of the country, appraisers have been found to be incompetent whether or not they had appropriately valued the property. Residential appraisers are most at risk, but some of the following applies to anyone doing appraisals for lending purposes.

Privacy Policy. Every report done for a lender must have a reference to the company’s privacy policy in compliance with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley (GLB) Act. Our corporate policy is included in the company policy manual and also on our site, under Privacy Policy. The corporate policy, which is also mailed to our regular clients on an annual basis, shows the connection between the GLB Act requirements and USPAP confidentiality requirements and can be added to a report, or the more generic GLB compliance statement that was previously distributed can be used.

Exposure Time. With the current edition of USPAP, we are no longer required to comment on Marketing Time (prior to the Date of Value), but we still need to discuss appropriate Exposure Time in every appraisal report. Appraiser competency has been questioned and is found wanting when the Exposure Time comment is not specific to the assignment. Simply stating that “exposure time of 60-90 days is appropriate” is NOT adequate. The exposure time must be specific to the type of property (i.e. single family homes of 1,800 to 2,200 square feet or single family homes in the $XXX,000 to $XXX,000 price range) and the market area.

In Fannie Mae form reports, Fannie Mae guidelines require the “Date of Sale/Time” to show both the contract date AND the closing date for the sales comparables. However they will accept just the closing date but you must state in the comments which date you used and the source, e.g. “The date of sale shown in the comparison grid is the closing date as recorded by the county recorder.”

Also, in the Fannie Mae form reports, the Cost Approach, if developed, must include the ‘entrepreneurial profit’ as a line entry; Marshall & Swift does not include that in the Residential Cost Handbook.

Appraisers should also be aware that the Marshall & Swift cost factors are based on subdivision construction, where material can be staged and crafts-people can be easily shifted. The replacement cost for a single home in a developed plat requires “just-in-time” material delivery, because there is no space to store it for a week or two until it is needed, and coordination of workers’ schedules, so the builder does not have a $60/hr employee standing around waiting for someone else to finish their work. One insurance company has estimated that such timing adds at least 10% to the replacement costs for fire damaged properties.

Per the instructor of a recent continuing education class, the above are just some of the deficiencies in residential appraisal reports where appraisers are being shown to be incompetent before the court even considers the accuracy of the valuation. When the appraiser deviates from regulations (USPAP), policy statements (Fannie Mae guidelines) or textbooks (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 13th Edition), it does not matter to a court what “is typical in this market.”

Appraisers and Condominium Reserve Studies

Barry C. Wilson August 5th, 2008

By Michael N. Read, Certified General Appraiser (WA & OR)
& Barry Wilson, Certified Residential Appraiser (WA)

Changes and new provisions to the Washington State Condominium Law, which took effect June 12, 2008, may impact valuations and appraiser liability. These need to be understood by appraisers (and by owners, purchasers, and real estate agents) when becoming involved with a condominium, whether it is newly declared or has been in existence for many years.

For a quick overview of this topic, refer to an excellent article by Elizabeth Rhodes of the Seattle Times.

For a complete and detailed look at the law itself, please see the Condominium Act and scroll down to Section 64.34.380 through 64.34.390. The history of the new legislation is available at http://www.leg.wa.gov/legislature. You can view the Original Bill or the Bill as Passed in Legislature.

The goal of the new law, sponsored by Senators Rodney Tom, Jim Honeyford, and Bob McCaslin, is to enhance consumer protection in the purchase and ownership of a condominium.

In addition, new rules adopted by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two secondary mortgage market enterprises that purchase most residential loans, now require that lenders verify that the community association has a line item in its budget requiring annual reserve contributions equal to 10 percent of revenues. An article in the Community Associations Institute New England Chapter newsletter on July 25, 2008 discusses the responsibilities of and potential liabilities for condominium home owners associations.

RCW 64.34.380 ‘encourages’ every Washington Home Owners Association (HOA) to establish a Reserve Account to fund major maintenance, repair and replacement of common elements, including limited (long term up to 30 years) common elements. The Reserve Account is to be established in the name of the Association and the board of directors of the HOA is responsible for administering the Reserve Account. The Reserve Account is to be separate from the HOA’s normal operating and maintenance budget.

‘Unless doing so would impose an unreasonable hardship’, the HOA must prepare and update a Reserve Study in accordance with the HOA’s governing documents and RCW 64.34.224 (1), which requires each unit to have a proportional undivided interest in the common elements.

The Reserve Study must be based on a ‘visual site inspection’ conducted by a ‘reserve study professional’. The Reserve Study must be updated annually and at least every 3 years be based on a ‘visual site inspection’ conducted by a ‘reserve study professional’.

This requirement does not apply to condominiums consisting solely of units that are restricted in the declaration to non-residential use.

In its definition of a Reserve Study, RCW 64.34.382 uses terminology that appraisers will immediately recognize from the Cost Approach. A Reserve Study must include:

  1. A reserve component list including quantities and estimates for useful life, remaining useful life, and current repair and replacement cost for each reserve component.
  2. The date of the Reserve Study and a statement that the study meets the requirement of this section.
  3. The level of Reserve Study performed.
    • Level I: Full Reserve Study, funding analysis and plan.
    • Level II: Update with visual site inspection.
    • Level III: Update with no visual site inspection.
  4. The association’s reserve account balance.
  5. The percentage of the fully funded balance that the reserve account contains.
  6. The special assessments already implemented or planned.
  7. Interest and inflation assumptions.
  8. Current Reserve Account contribution rate.
  9. Recommended Reserve Account contribution rate.
  10. Projected Reserve Account balance for thirty years and a funding plan to pay for projected costs from those reserves without reliance on future unplanned special assessments; and
  11. Whether the Reserve Study was prepared by a ‘reserve study professional’.

The Reserve Study must also include a disclosure that warns about the failure to include a particular component or provide contributions to the Reserve Account for that component may result in the unit owner having to pay on demand a special assessment for that component.

RCW 64.34.384 allows the HOA to withdraw funds from the Reserve Account for unforeseen and unbudgeted items providing they notify the unit owners and repay the amount within 24 months, unless the 24 months would impose an ‘unreasonable burden’ on the unit owners.

RCW 64.34.386 gives unit owners legal recourse to demand of the HOA a Reserve Study if none has been completed within the past three years. The unit owner’s duty to pay for common expenses cannot be excused because of the HOA’s failure to comply.

RCW 64.34.388 relates to the preparation and updating of a Reserve Study at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

RCW 64.34.390 may be of particular interest and concern to appraisers (and real estate agents) as it states that monetary damages or any other liability MAY NOT BE AWARDED against or imposed upon the association, the officers or board of directors of the association, or those persons who may have provided advice or assistance to the association or its officers or directors, for failure to: Establish a Reserve Account; have a current Reserve Study prepared or updated in accordance with the RCW 64.34.380 through 64.34.388, or make the reserve disclosures in accordance with RCW 64.34.382 and other referenced RCWs.

The legislation as written idemnifies all parties involved in the production, management and maintenance of a condominium but leaves the unit owners, purchasers, and their advocates (the very parties who the legislative author’s goal was to protect) with little legal recourse.

A Reserve Study Professional is defined as ‘an independent person suitably qualified by knowledge, skill, experience, training or education to prepare a Reserve Study in accordance with Sections 1 and 2 of this act.’

This definition is not very definitive and could easily result in poorly prepared and ineffective Reserve Studies where the preparer is protected from any liability!

Because of the dearth of professionals currently providing Reserve Studies, community managers, CPAs, contractors and other related professionals are rushing in to fill the void. Appraisers and home inspectors may look upon this as an opportunity to provide a new fee service. Be careful!

Mike Read, the primary author of this article, states:

“I have personally assisted in the preparation of these studies in Oregon under the tutelage of a licensed architect and even though I am a degreed engineer (Mechanical, UK) and a Certified General Appraiser licensed in Washington and Oregon, I do not feel qualified to complete a Reserve Study without additional training and experience. At present I am not aware of any education available in this field, but a background in Building Sciences would be relevant. There is an organization, the Community Association Institute (CAI), which has some certifications, but I do not know the details of their educational path.”

Nena Groskind, the author of the article in the CAI New England Chapter newsletter referenced above, recommends that the Reserve Study be performed by an engineering firm “with expertise in this area.”

There are two main parts to a Reserve Study. The first requires the completion of a ‘Property Condition Assessment’ which is a detailed site inspection of the property and all its common areas and systems. This report identifies the immediate repairs and replacements required plus short and long term replacements required of all common area components. The second part is the number crunching, which places the work items in an orderly time and dollar budget (RCW 64.34.380 recommends a 30-year projection for major maintenance and replacement), to be presented to the HOA and its owners. In her article, Ms. Groskind also noted that IRS regulations require separation between operating funds for maintenance and reserve accounts for replacement and strongly cautioned against commingling funds.

If an appraiser (or real estate agent) is involved in the transfer of a condominium (in Washington State) where there is an action brought by a unit owner or purchaser for nondisclosure of a pending assessment or large unfunded or undisclosed liability contained in a Reserve Study, they could be the only entity in the chain of responsibility that could be held liable. Likewise an appraisal that does not include in its value conclusion the amount and effect of such an assessment or unfunded liability could become the focus for recourse of action by an owner or purchaser.

In preparing a condominium appraisal report on the Fannie Mae form 1073, the appraiser must answer four questions in the “Project Analysis” section on page 2; two of those questions may now have more significance. The appraiser is expected to comment on the project budget for the current year and the adequacy of fees, reserves, etc. and to opine how the unit charge compares to competitive projects of similar quality and design.

Just stating that the budget was not analyzed because the documents were not provided and checking the “Average” box may not be an adequate defense.

Henceforth, when appraising a condominium, in addition to the other documents typically required (minutes of annual membership or monthly board meetings, resale certificate, etc.), it is incumbent upon the appraiser to obtain a copy of the current Reserve Study. If none is available, the appraiser should clearly state in the report that:

  1. A copy of the Reserve Study described under the provisions of RCW 64.34.380 was not provided to the appraiser (and describe the efforts made to obtain same);
  2. Inadequate reserves for replacement of critical components of the building could result in special assessments that would financially impact the borrower;
  3. The opinion of value is based on the Extraordinary Assumption that the HOA has adequate reserves and/or plans to address such expenses; and
  4. If this assumption proves to be in error, the value of the property could be affected.

The authors of this article are both experienced appraisers and are aware of appraisers being sued for failure to disclose critical financial information or information on property conditions that impact value. With the changes to both Washington law and the lending requirements of Fannie Mae, more responsibilities are being placed on the appraiser.


About the Authors:

Michael N. Read has been appraising residential and commercial property in Washington, Oregon and Mexico since 1986.

Barry C. Wilson has been appraising residential property in Washington since 1986.

Additional expertise concerning the items discussed above was provided by:
Carson M. Horton, RS of HOA Services Group, LLC in Beaverton, Oregon.
[email protected]
www.hoaservicesgroup.com

Training Trainees - Defining Supervision

Valerie A. Dreas July 11th, 2008

I remember back to those blissfully ignorant days when I said “yes” to be an appraisal trainee. I was lucky and worked for a large corporation and thus, a salary and benefits were included in this career change. It was not until several years later when I left that company to become a fee appraiser that I really began to appreciate the abject poverty and financial worry that I had been spared during my apprenticeship.

Trainee Selection
Therefore, when a potential trainee consents to go through that financial struggle, I do not take the responsibility of training someone to be an appraiser lightly. One, their success or lack thereof will reflect back on me; and two, I do not want someone to lose their license and career because of something I did or did not teach them. And so, the task of taking on a trainee should be considered – like marriage – soberly and carefully with all due consideration for the amount of time that will be expended, and likely never recouped, during the three year process.

It is important for a supervisor to pick someone who has the potential for greatness as an appraiser. Sometimes, that is not always readily seen in the interview process. So, I look for several things: intelligence, writing skill (yes, I do ask for a writing sample), articulation, education, and the all important computer skills. I also look for someone with a backbone and enthusiasm for doing the job. I also have the heart-to-heart talk about the financial struggles that are expected. I usually get one of two reactions: “That will not happen to me,” or, “Uh, maybe I’ll work for McDonalds. They pay better.”

As an aside, I will just mention here about the backbone part. I have fond memories of my review sessions with my supervisor. We would discuss the report at length and then I would exit her office and my coworkers would ask me if I was okay. I realized that our discussions got sort of loud as we both passionately “discussed” appraisal theory and practice. However, I look at it this way; it was great training for responding to those pesky clients who “insist” that the value is too high or too low – whichever position is to their advantage. Further, a backbone will help offset the rejection and downright rudeness encountered when trying to confirm comparables with buyer, sellers and brokers. Ya’ll are smiling right now cause you know what I mean.

Defining Supervision
Merriam-Webster defines the word supervision as “the action, process, or occupation of supervising; especially: a critical watching and directing (as of activities or a course of action).” In applying this to trainee supervision, the meaning here is to watch or review critically whatever a trainee does. The same source defines critical as “exercising or involving careful judgment or judicious evaluation.” Therefore, supervising and critically evaluating a trainee’s work does not involve sending them out on their own and reading through the report and putting a signature on it. What it does involve is a lot of time and effort in carefully guiding a trainee’s thinking regarding how to look at properties, understanding the scope of work for the appraisal, defining potential problems, and understanding valuation and economic theory.

Client Relationships
I have several hard and fast rules regarding client relations and trainees. My trainees do not discuss anything with a client other than setting up the site visit or asking for specific documents. They are never to discuss the valuation or issues regarding the property with a client – EVER. During the site visit, they are to take pictures and wait to ask me questions later. (The no talking rule abates when the trainee has some more experience under their belt.) As a trainee’s education and experience grows and they get closer to sitting for their license exam, they become more involved in the business of dealing with clients and putting together proposals and marketing packages.

I expect the new trainee to be in my office almost 70 percent of their day for the first few months and joined at the hip when out in the field. My focus is commercial property and that is a very broad range of property types, each with its own unique issues that need to be addressed. I have forms for site visits and comparables visits to help direct a trainee’s focus. I have scripts for verifications so that that the main questions are asked and answered.

Every detail is looked at, reviewed, and discussed with respect to the final work product. Comparable searches are done together, at first. Later, the trainee performs searches on their own and then comes in to discuss them. While we are talking, I’m pulling up the databases as well to see if we get the same properties. Afterward, each comparable is analyzed and red flags are noted. At this time, I explain what is important for this property type to look at and what questions will need to be asked during the confirmation process.

When the valuation has been completed, the final report document is brought up and reviewed – line by line. The file and the trainee are at my desk during this process to answer questions. If there are holes in the report that need to be addressed, I ask questions like who, what, where, when and why. If the trainee cannot answer those questions to my satisfaction, they are sent back to their desk to get the answers. Obviously, this is a time consuming process. However, by the time I am finished
reviewing the report and concluding the final value, I know everything about how the value was derived.

It disturbs me when clients tell me that they hired a certified appraiser and when they call with a question regarding a report, they are passed to a trainee to answer their question. Basically the supervising appraiser is saying they do not know enough about how the value was derived to answer the question. This also undermines the client’s confidence in the value, because a person without the specialized knowledge they are paying for performed the appraisal. That should never happen. The
supervisor’s signature is attesting to the fact that the value is true. How can they attest to that if they cannot discuss how the value was derived?

The recent change in Washington law regarding the trainee’s bill was a good one. However, it is only half the battle. The remaining battle needs to be fought in each appraisal office with respect to what supervision entails. It is up to each designated and certified appraiser to ensure that appraisal quality is at its highest, and that trainees are adequately trained and supervised so that the next generation of appraisers are better than the last. My ultimate hope is to hear someone say, “That person is a damn good appraiser.” My response will be, “I know. I trained them.”

Comments regarding this article can be posted at www.lambhansonlamb.com/blog.

We’ve Got A Long Way To Go!

Michael B. Lamb, MAI, SRA July 1st, 2008

In the 1930’s, in the depths of the depression, knowledgeable, intelligent, farsighted men organized what would become the two strongest, best known, and most professional appraisal organizations: The Society of Real Estate Appraisers and The American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers. When they were organized there was no intent, in my opinion, that they would become competitors, or that either group would seek to become the largest or more important professional appraisal organization. The men who gave birth to both of these excellent societies were genuinely and idealistically motivated to simply provide the very best professional appraisal service to the American public.

In the years immediately following, several other prestigious groups were formed, notably the American Society of Appraisers, the American Right of Way Association, the Independent Fee Appraisers, the Organization of Governmental Appraisers and others. All of these groups had various goals to achieve, but their primary aim was the same: To make real estate appraising a profession and all of their members true professionals.

Now let’s have the courage to call an obvious fact a fact. A whole passel of so-called appraisers licensed and certified have sprung up over the years, to a point where the public is overwhelmed and confused not knowing who’s the most qualified, because they all present themselves to be able to appraise or analyze all types of properties and real estate investments whether competent or not.

I don’t know why we can’t say what the problem is, because the public, our judges, attorneys, clients, lenders and knowledgeable laity, are saying it out loud repeatedly, writing letters about appraisers, the actions of appraisers, and reporting fraudulent, unethical and incompetent activities in ever-increasing numbers. And just what is it they are saying? The ones who only have a cursory knowledge of real estate and real estate appraising simply state that, based on their experiences, the letter designations don’t seem to mean a thing. The public does not seem to recognize the difference between a Designation and a State licensed or certified appraiser. They report that one seems to be just as bad as any other, and none of them seem to be real professionals. But the people who have a bit more sophistication, which include the courts, attorneys, lenders, and today the majority of the buying and selling public, are more articulate and more specific. They will mince no words and tell you that they know why most of the so-called appraisers came into existence during the past 15+ years: These johnny-come-latelies passed State exams with a minimal amount of training and dubious course work and have grown because it is relatively easy to get.

They have the minimum education requirements with very little work review, simply send in a log showing you have taken some courses and take a simple test; send in your money and you’ll be granted a license or certification. This plus the minimum continuing education courses of study are far below the rigid requirements that have made the Institute and like organizations strong, progressive, viable sources, and centers of professional growth and knowledge. The various designations of the Institute continuously demand hard work, dedication, additional study and a willingness to subscribe to a set of professional ethics and standards. Not the minimum standards found in licenses, certifications or designations COD by return mail.

I have talked about drawing in new members through our professionalism, ethics, continuing education, ability to make more money, and a strong, national, unified appraisal organization. These are different topics, but all inter-related and having a common goal. The public, our clients, are not talking about us as much as I would like, and I am afraid they don’t know who we are. I believe it is time for us to stand up, look at ourselves in the mirror of reality, and tell it like it is. The question is what are you, you, going to do about it?

Professional real estate appraising, in my opinion, is at a very serious stage in its history; we either go forward or backward. We are at a crossroad. We must take action. I believe we are in the position of the bicycle rider pedaling up a hill with a tiger on his tail: we can’t stop or stand still, and if we try to coast, we’ll go back downhill, so our only course is to keep on pedaling.

You’re right: Real estate appraising and real estate appraisers have come a long way since the middle 1930’s, but I believe the battle is just beginning, and we’ve still got a long, long way to go.

A Template for Success

Patrick M. Lamb May 2nd, 2008

Lamb Hanson Lamb’s core competency is performing residential and commercial real estate appraisals. This has been their niche for nearly four generations. Historically, the real estate appraisal business has been a very durable industry because the demand for services runs with certain marketplace inevitabilities such as probate, taxes, and property transactions. However, the way they perform real estate appraisals has changed several times in the last twenty years as a result of shifts in banking policy, legal regulations and new technology.

In the 80’s, word processing, electronic databases and the internet were nonexistent. Real estate appraisers were required to go to the county court house to gather sales documents directly from the assessor’s office; property photos were physically developed at the a one-hour photo mart, and all appraisal reports were hand-typed, mostly by a receptionist. This all took time and a specialized skill set that the market place paid good fees for – appraisal fees were at their highest at that point.

In the early 90’s, however, the dawn of the computer drastically changed the way information was recorded and accessed. Real estate information that was originally in paper format held by the county and large title companies suddenly moved to a computerized database format. Larger real estate appraisal firms benefited greatly from this transition since they could afford to purchase or license access to these expensive database services. Instantly, appraisers could perform their duties without spending countless hours working through large catalogues of printed records at the court house.

Independent real estate appraisers working in small shops or out of their home could not feasibly cover the expense of a database. As such, they stuck to the old ways of appraisal reporting. Eventually, the independent appraiser couldn’t compete as larger firms were able to cut weeks off the delivery of reports.

Consequently, as access to real estate information became available at their fingertips, appraisers found themselves having to perform more of the research and report assembly tasks that were previously performed by hourly workers. Learning these new technical skills really presented a challenge for the well-established appraisers who have been operating under the previous model for years.

Simultaneously, the overhead structure at appraisal firms was changing as the increased use of computers and real estate databases eliminated the need for typists and young researchers. These people were beginning to be replaced with hardware, software, and technical specialists who knew how to setup and maintain the systems.

Computer databasing was the first big technological transition, along with the emergence of the internet and the digital business environment. For many in the appraisal industry, this was a lot to digest.

About the time Patrick Lamb entered the family company, Lamb Hanson Lamb Appraisal Associates, Inc. His college experience at the University of Washington had been heavily influenced by new technology. During his tenure at the “U”, the hottest concentration on campus was Information Systems. He was fortunate to take advantage and learn software programs that were beginning to dominate the outside business world, as well.

At the time he joined Lamb Hanson Lamb, the majority of the appraisers at the office and in the appraisal networks he joined knew little about computers. Patrick was able to use his computer skills to barter for appraisal mentoring, and begin to steer the company into the technical realm.

In his first year at the firm he was an apprentice to several residential appraisers; doing research, taking pictures, making maps and filling out forms for his mentors. Over this time, he was exposed to the existing systems and technology that had been developed for performing residential appraisal reports. The systems were impressive yet suffered from a multitude of technical and human errors.

Coincidentally, the appraisal industry as a whole was in need of streamlining as the volume of residential mortgage work increased. This was due to the deregulation of the mortgage industry and an unparalleled drop in interest rates. This phenomenon drove the implementation of technology efficiencies in the residential lending process.

The streamlining consisted of using a new digital form of reporting that standardized the residential appraisal process, making it far less time consuming. Unfortunately for the industry, though, the larger banker clients saw this as an opportunity to put downward pressure on fees and higher expectations for fast turn times. Consequently, the established appraiser networks, faced with shrinking fees, felt that the one way to stall the fee drop was to constrain the number of appraisers in the industry. So, they set out to increase the barriers to entrance by upping educational requirements and eventually passing legislation that mandated all trainees to be licensed. (This argument was masked as a way to limit fraud, yet that should be the role of the established appraiser mentors not the naive apprentices. The increased barriers only hurt new employees trying to get a start).

Suddenly, Lamb Hanson Lamb’s residential department was caught in a storm. Fees started falling, education costs soared, technical staffing and systems costs increased, pressure from clients escalated and, worst of all, the feasibility of hiring and training new employees began to fail. This stalled their potential for growth. At the same time, the appraisers were struggling to learn these new computer skills. Their morale was low, despite the spike in business from the hot real estate market and declining interest rates.

To hedge himself from the apparent decline in the residential appraisal market, Patrick decided to focus on another side of appraising. He become a trainee in the commercial department, and again, his technical skills played an intricate part in securing training opportunities with mentors. Within the first couple of months in the commercial department he realized that the technology and systems used to perform narrative commercial reports was five to ten years behind the residential department and depending on the appraiser, sometimes even greater. There was little to no use of Excel; only a basic understanding of Word; no use of digital filing or archiving; no use of Access databasing, and little understanding of computer networks and Internet capabilities.

While most commercial appraisers in the office and throughout the nation were well-established, (of an older generation), and contained massive amounts of education, experience and knowledge, they were entirely resistant to the new and emerging ideas. More so, their influence in the firm made them seemingly invincible to change, as even the boss was hesitant to learn new tricks. Patrick also discovered that, despite their great depth of knowledge and background, that there were no superstar employees. Their revenues and production were flat, if not on the decline. This in part, was due to all the time wasted fidgeting with the report formatting, editing, publication, and redundancies. In sum, Patrick felt they all “shared a deficiency of digital wherewithal.”

It quickly became evident to Patrick that he could create a new system that combined his computer skills with some of the digital efficiencies he witnessed in the residential department. He knew that the fees for a standard commercial appraisal report are ten to twenty times greater than the fees for residential appraisal reports. He believed that with the system he envisioned, appraisers could produce commercial narrative reports at a rapid speed, yet with greater reliability, less errors and nearly seamless transferability of data. Therefore, he began developing a template for commercial appraisers.

Patrick states that “creating a template was definitely a work in progress, an evolution that still exists today”. To make the whole process work well, the entire office needed to become digital in unison. They had relied on thirty years of appraisal history locked in paperback copies, sitting on shelves collecting dust. The filing system for the old reports was random and burdensome to access.

To start the evolution, Patrick hired a friend to come into the office and scan as many documents as he could, then convert the paper into a Word document that could be filed. From this point, he was able to categorize hundreds of zoning code descriptions, market area descriptions, building type descriptions, etc. that were accessible to anyone in the office. The advantage to having easy access to this data was that it was now in a digital narrative format that read well - likely created by the well-educated, experienced and knowledgeable real estate appraisers mentioned before. A young trainee could simply cut and paste a sample and modify the existing statements to meet the needs of the new assignment. He or she could build off of what had already been created and wouldn’t have to stare into a blank page.

Within the template design stage, he also saw that technical skill was not the only component of a success. More so, he had to learn how people interfaced with the system. It was his exposure to human behavior and reactions that began to mold his vision into a reality. “This took a few years to perfect…which is an overstatement since it’s still nowhere near perfect”, he declares.

By 2005, the template system was relatively operational, and since then,the system has provided many competitive advantages to the firm. Nevertheless, Patrick says it has been somewhat difficult to convince established appraisers in the office to adapt. He believes that this is one of the greatest challenges he’ll face in the upcoming years as other firms begin to benefit from their own technological advances.

To maintain competitiveness, Lamb Hanson Lamb operates on a six-month cycle, to ensure that their technological systems and methods are up-to-date. They realize that systems will change, and Patrick, as CEO, hopes to create a culture at Lamb Hanson Lamb Appraisal Associates, Inc. that embraces the willingness to change, while abandoning the comfort of “doing things the old way”. This is the true template for success.